Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 09:54:37AM +0200, Oleksandr Shulgin wrote:
>> AFAIK, there is nothing in the protocol that forces psql to make an extra
>> connection attempt. If libpq provided a means to pass a password-prompt
>> callback, no extra connection would be needed I think?
> That is true. I don't think we want the backend to be kept open waiting
> for someone to type a password, which is why, I think, we don't do it
> that way.
Yeah, I think this is an ancient value judgement. Sure, it's pretty
questionable whether spawning a backend a second time is better than
tying one up waiting for a human to type a password. (It's going to
be spending a lot of time waiting for that human later on, anyway.)
The real point IMO is that libpq's connection API is already
unreasonably complicated, and providing a callback of this sort
would make it even messier. A different client library might make
a different choice, perhaps.
regards, tom lane
