Re: Trouble with hashagg spill I/O pattern and costing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Trouble with hashagg spill I/O pattern and costing
Date
Msg-id 315722e3adb1eeb7f707fb649853e04c43d4711b.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Trouble with hashagg spill I/O pattern and costing  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Trouble with hashagg spill I/O pattern and costing
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 20:54 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> The last column is master with the tlist tweak alone - it's better
> than
> hashagg on master alone, but it's not nearly as good as with both
> tlist
> and prealloc patches.

Right, I certainly think we should do the prealloc change, as well.

I'm tweaking the patch to be a bit more flexible. I'm thinking we
should start the preallocation list size ~8 and then double it up to
~128 (depending on your results). That would reduce the waste in case
we have a large number of small partitions.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Trouble with hashagg spill I/O pattern and costing
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Trouble with hashagg spill I/O pattern and costing