Re: EINTR in ftruncate() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: EINTR in ftruncate()
Date
Msg-id 3153247.1657834482@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: EINTR in ftruncate()  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: EINTR in ftruncate()
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> So why would I add another wrapper like PG_SETMASK and leave it
> unimplemented for now on Windows, when I could just use sigprocmask()
> directly and leave it unimplemented for now on Windows?

Fair enough, I guess.  No objection to this patch.

(Someday we oughta go ahead and make our Windows signal API look more
like POSIX, as I suggested back in 2015.  I'm still not taking
point on that, though.)

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: EINTR in ftruncate()
Next
From: "Euler Taveira"
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting.