Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?
Date
Msg-id 31523.1392822224@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> GET_8_BYTES only exists for 64bit systems.

> Right, I got that far.  So it looks like float8, int8, timestamp,
> timestamptz, and money all have behavior contingent on
> USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL, making that symbol a misnomer in every way.  But
> since we've already marched pretty far down that path I suppose we
> should keep marching.

You need somebody to help you with getting that working on 32-bit
platforms?  Because it needs to get fixed, or reverted, PDQ.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST support for inet datatypes
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?