Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id 31353.1550351689@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2/14/19 8:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a
>>>> light vote for MATERIALIZED.  It reads easier, seems more grammatically
>>>> correct, and uses an existing word.

>>> +1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in
>>> https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql

>> Seconded!

> +1 to MATERIALIZED too

I was expecting more controversy ... pushed that way.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Reviving the "Stopping logical replication protocol" patch fromVladimir Gordichuk
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs