Re: VACUUM/ANALYZE counting of in-doubt tuples - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: VACUUM/ANALYZE counting of in-doubt tuples
Date
Msg-id 3125.1195497183@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM/ANALYZE counting of in-doubt tuples  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: VACUUM/ANALYZE counting of in-doubt tuples  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 10:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The race conditions are a lot more subtle than that.  The stats
>> collector cannot know when it receives a tabstat message after VACUUM
>> starts whether VACUUM has/will see the tuples involved, or whether it
>> will see them as committed or not.  That would depend on whether VACUUM
>> has yet reached the page(s) the tuples are in.

> I think the before-and-after approach can be made to work:

> VACUUM just needs to save the counter in memory, it doesn't need to
> write that anywhere else.

> VACUUM can force the flush of the tabstat file so that there is no race
> condition, or at least a minimised one.

I don't think you understood what I said at all.  The race condition is
not "before vs after VACUUM starts", it is "before vs after when VACUUM
scans the page that the in-doubt tuple is in".
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM/ANALYZE counting of in-doubt tuples
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM/ANALYZE counting of in-doubt tuples