Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote:
> 0003:
>
> * I'm not sure the batch-specific callbacks should be mandatory
>
> diff --git a/src/backend/access/table/tableamapi.c b/src/backend/access/table/tableamapi.c
> index 5450a27faeb..9ef6b5cca65 100644
> --- a/src/backend/access/table/tableamapi.c
> +++ b/src/backend/access/table/tableamapi.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ GetTableAmRoutine(Oid amhandler)
> Assert(routine->scan_end != NULL);
> Assert(routine->scan_rescan != NULL);
> Assert(routine->scan_getnextslot != NULL);
> + Assert(routine->scan_getnextbatch != NULL);
> + Assert(routine->batch_slot_callbacks != NULL);
I mean the callback is mandatory in the current version, but ISTM that
nodeSeqscan.c does not work here if the AM does not support batching.
--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
