Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl kill support for KILL signal was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add test for postmaster crash restarts. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl kill support for KILL signal was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add test for postmaster crash restarts.
Date
Msg-id 31003.1506895287@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl kill support for KILL signal was Re:[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add test for postmaster crash restarts.  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl kill support for KILL signal was Re:[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add test for postmaster crash restarts.
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-10-01 17:47:52 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> So we can leave it out of there. OTOH I'm not a huge fan of security by
>> obscurity. I guess this wouldn't be too bad a case.

> I'd personally include it, given that we already allow and document
> ABRT. There's no meaningful difference between the two.

True.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: faster version of tpcb-like transaction
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl kill support for KILL signal was Re:[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add test for postmaster crash restarts.