On 9/5/21, 12:14 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com> writes:
>> Is there a specific style you have in mind for this change, or is your
>> point that the CASE statement should only be reserved for when
>> is_default_acl is true?
>
> I'd be inclined to split this logic out into a separate if-statement,
> along the lines of
Got it, thanks.
Nathan
