Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Date
Msg-id 30790.1386633414@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net> writes:
> Arguably 1-3 are inaccurate since they're not really about a backend dying... they occur during the startup phase;
younever even get a functioning backend. That's a marked difference from other uses of FATAL.
 

How so?  "FATAL" means "an error that terminates your session", which
is exactly what these are.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good