Re: Lock partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Lock partitions
Date
Msg-id 3078.1157988568@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Lock partitions  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Lock partitions  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Lock partitions  (Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It would be nice to see some results from the OSDL tests with, say, 4,
>> 8, and 16 lock partitions before we forget about the point though.
>> Anybody know whether OSDL is in a position to run tests for us?

> Yeah, I can run some dbt2 tests in the lab.  I'll get started on it. 
> We're still a little bit away from getting the automated testing for 
> PostgreSQL going again though.

Great, thanks.  The thing to twiddle is LOG2_NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS in
src/include/storage/lwlock.h.  You need a full backend recompile
after changing it, but you shouldn't need to initdb, if that helps.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib/xml2 and PG_MODULE_MAGIC
Next
From: Gevik Babakhani
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for GUID datatype