> On 2 Jul 2019, at 22:16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> even if we made a test case that presumed
> --enable-nls and tried to exercise this, the lack of translations
> for the new words would get in the way for a long while.
For testing though, couldn’t we have an autogenerated .po which has a unique
and predictable dummy value translation for every string (the string backwards
or something), which can be used for testing? This is all hand-wavy since I
haven’t tried actually doing it, but it seems a better option than waiting for
.po files to be available. Or am I missing the point of the value of the
discussed test?
cheers ./daniel
