Re: WAL file compatibility - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: WAL file compatibility
Date
Msg-id 3073cc9b0910202139s4b00a57sd908ec10910fdedf@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL file compatibility  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> writes:
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> OS per se shouldn't matter
>
>> unless you try to do it between windows and some flavor of linux
>
> hmmm ... even there, the only risk factor I see would be incompatible
> locale behaviors, which you could avoid by making sure to use C locale
> on both sides.  That could possibly be an issue between any two OSes,
> I suppose.
>

mmm... i was convinced windows had diferences in binary files just
like on text files (ie: in text files there are differences because of
the EOL character) but a litlle test seems to confirm that a WAL file
generated on windows could be read on linux.

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum Full - stops responding(?)
Next
From: "stefan"
Date:
Subject: Re: How to troubleshoot a halted postgres 8.3 ?