Re: [RFC] obtaining the function call stack - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: [RFC] obtaining the function call stack
Date
Msg-id 3073cc9b0907131402t380becf3i45ea3f705e4e502f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] obtaining the function call stack  ("A.M." <agentm@themactionfaction.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM, A.M.<agentm@themactionfaction.com> wrote:
>
> How would I go about generating a meaningful backtrace for a plpgsql
> function that calls a plperl function? One would also expect a C function
> which calls a plpgsql function to appear, too, no? Shouldn't there be a
> unified backtrace subsystem?
>

i guess, that is what Alvaro is suggesting

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "A.M."
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] obtaining the function call stack
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: final preparations for CommitFest 2009-07