Re: LIMIT NULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: LIMIT NULL
Date
Msg-id 3073cc9b0902041120j6536b33dt643728d0ee047fdd@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LIMIT NULL  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: LIMIT NULL  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Still, the queries-limit.html page includes this statement: "OFFSET 0
> is the same as omitting the OFFSET clause."  I don't see that there
> would be anything bad or confusing about changing it to read this way:
> "OFFSET 0 is the same as omitting the OFFSET clause, and LIMIT NULL is
> the same as omitting the LIMIT clause."  In fact, it seems nicely
> symmetric.
>

good point...

can we just apply this one and let this discussion off?
or maybe remove the OFFSET part and point to the SQL COMMAND
references page? (doesn't seem appropiate to me to reject the LIMIT
comment and let the other one in there while they are almost the same)


--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: add_path optimization
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: on hash indexes