On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> This would all be a little easier to accomplish if the behavior were
> made to be implicit in the rewriter (ie, rewrite instead of throwing a
> "no rule" error), since then there is no persistent state that a GUC or
> reloption would have to try to add or get rid of.
why we don't follow this path from the beggining?
what are the pros and cons of this?
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
