Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 28 May 2022, at 14:59, Roffild <roffild@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> This patch fixes an issue inside Docker and will not affect other builds.
> Looks like you generated the patch backwards, it's removing the lines you
> propose to add.
Lacks documentation, too. But it doesn't matter, because we are not
going to accept such a "feature". The OP has offered no justification
why this is necessary (and no, he's not the first who's ever used
Postgres inside Docker). Introducing a security hole that goes
against twenty-five years of deliberate project policy is going to
require a heck of a lot better-reasoned argument than "there's an
issue inside Docker".
regards, tom lane
