On Jun14, 2012, at 15:28 , Euler Taveira wrote:
> On 14-06-2012 02:19, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I still think that pushing this off to openssl (not an ssh tunnel, but
>> the underlying transport library) would be an adequate solution.
>> If you are shoving data over a connection that is long enough to need
>> compression, the odds that every bit of it is trustworthy seem pretty
>> small, so you need encryption too.
>>
> I don't want to pay the SSL connection overhead. Also I just want compression,
> encryption is not required. OpenSSL give us encryption with/without
> compression; we need an option to obtain compression in non-SSL connections.
AFAIR, openssl supports a NULL cipher which doesn't do any encryption. We
could have a connection parameter, say compress=on, which selects that
cipher (unless sslmode is set to prefer or higher, of course).
SSL NULL-chipher connections would be treated like unencrypted connections
when matching against pg_hba.conf.
best regards,
Florian Pflug
