Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Date
Msg-id 30347.1545844056@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables)  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 11:22:39AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In my hands, the only part of the low-level parsing code that
>> commonly shows up as interesting in profiles is the Bison engine.

> Should we be considering others?

We've looked around before, IIRC, and not really seen any arguably
better tools.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mitar
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature: triggers on materialized views
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)