Re: Unused header file inclusion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Unused header file inclusion
Date
Msg-id 30291.1566252595@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unused header file inclusion  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-08-19 13:07:50 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2019-08-18 14:37:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Oddly, cpluspluscheck does not complain about those cases, but it
>>> does complain about

>> Hm. I don't understand why it's not complaining. Wonder if it's a
>> question of the flags or such.

> I'ts caused by -fsyntax-only

Ah-hah.  Should we change that to something else?  That's probably
a hangover from thinking that all we had to do was check for C++
keywords.

>> I wish we could move the whole logic of those scripts into makefiles, so
>> we could employ parallelism.

I can't really get excited about expending a whole bunch of additional
work on these scripts.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Unused header file inclusion
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: PANIC: could not flush dirty data: Operation not permittedpower8, Redhat Centos