Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-02-02 00:09:03 +0100, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> Something is broken in HEAD:
> Hm. Indeed.
> The issue is that we're generating ProjectSet nodes instead of Result
> for the top-level nodes - but we currently assume that ProjectSet nodes
> actually contain sets. I'm tentatively in favor of generating proper
> Result nodes in this case, rather than allowing this in ProjectSet - on
> the other hand, it works after removing that Assert().
> Tom, do you have an opinion?
Yes, it's broken. split_pathtarget_at_srfs seems to be doing the right
thing, but then something later is recombining the last two steps.
I should be able to find it soon.
Does it really work without the Assert? I'd think you'd get srf-
where-not-supported errors if the SRF isn't at top level.
regards, tom lane
