> On 20 Feb 2024, at 14:23, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we did that, numeric_big would be even further down the list of
> expensive tests, and I'd say it should be run by default.
My motivation for raising this was to get a test which is executed as part of
parallel_schedule to make failures aren't missed. If we get there by slimming
down numeric_big to keep the unique coverage then that sounds like a good plan
to me.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
