Re: [GENERAL] PgPool or alternatives - Mailing list pgsql-general

Hi.

I had to implement something similar some time ago. Basically, a group of database servers (postgres) geographically
distributed,with each one having a group of servers in each datacenter, and each server preferring the nearest database
server,but allowing connections to a further one if the nearest is down. 

After going through different solutions (pgpool between them), I got to Postgres BDR with HAProxy. Each app server
connectsto the local HAProxy, which forwards the connection to the nearest available database server(preference is set
directlyin the HAProxy configuration). That way, I get high availability and replication happens really fast, right
afterthe transaction is committed. 

The only drawback with Postgres BDR is it has some limitations:

- New databases are NOT replicated; but you can have any number of databases with no problem.
- Users & roles must be replicated manually, as BDR works at database-level.
- There are some DDL restrictions: mostly due to how BDR works internally. In my experience, none of them has been a
realproblem. Full list: http://bdr-project.org/docs/stable/ddl-replication-statements.html 
- DDL replication may sometimes mean automatic cancellation of running transactions. so it must be carefully planned.
However,consider TEMPORARY TABLES are not replicated, so DDL on them is not affected by BDR restrictions. 
- Even when BDR documentations says nothing about this, it can have trouble replicating really large transactions. In
myexperience, my BDR cluster stopped replicating (had to rebuild it) when an app made a 8 million records update in a
singletransaction. Since that app was corrected, nothing similar has ever happened, and I think most apps should not
haveproblems with this. 

Alvaro Aguayo
Jefe de Operaciones
Open Comb Systems E.I.R.L.

Oficina: (+51-1) 3377813 | RPM: #034252 / (+51) 995540103  | RPC: (+51) 954183248
Website: www.ocs.pe

----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Windsor" <simon.windsor@cornfield.me.uk>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Saturday, 21 January, 2017 2:38:59 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] PgPool or alternatives

Hi

My employer wants to move from an in house Oracle solution to a cloud
based Postgres system. The system will involve a number of data loaders
running 24x7 feeding several Postgres Databases that will be used by
internal applications and external customer applications.

For the record, internal and external applications make heavy use of
Temporary tables, that are session related. This requirement means I
cannot consider normal replication methods.

Is PgPool the only viable that will allow the system the data loaders to
feed [n] databases that will be functional identical?

Simon

--
Simon Windsor

Eml: simon.windsor@cornfield.me.uk
Tel: 01454 617689
Mob: 0755 197 9733


“There is nothing in the world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and he who considers
priceonly is that man's lawful prey.” 



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general