Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I vote for not trying to make this more complicated and just accepting
> the original proposal. It's about a factor of ten increase over the
> limit we have right now, which doesn't seem like enough to cause any
> real breakage, and it should be enough to satisfy the majority of the
> people who are unhappy with the current limit, and it is very little
> work.
+1 ... we've surely beaten this topic to death by now.
regards, tom lane
