Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?
Date
Msg-id 3000229.1775626335@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> Here's what I came up with for pg_upgrade.  It tests each database's
> encodings with PG_VALID_BE_ENCODING(), and looks like this when it
> fails:
> ...
> I'll wait a bit longer for this one, on the off chance of reviews at
> this late hour.

Passes a quick eyeball check, anyway.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haibo Yan
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] DISTINCT in plain aggregate window functions
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?