Re: Another planner/optimizer question... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: Another planner/optimizer question...
Date
Msg-id 3.0.5.32.20011102110255.01fbb4d0@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Another planner/optimizer question...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 10:22 1/11/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>The best I could offer
>you (short of a complete redesign of subqueries) would be to not pull up
>views that have any subqueries, which would probably be a net loss.

That's probably true 90% percent of the time; it would be interesting to be
able to turn this on & off on a per-query basis (or even a per-view basis).
Is this hard?




----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD"
Date:
Subject: Re: Serious performance problem
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: compiler warnings in ODBC