At 12:20 AM 26-06-2001 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> at this point in time, i do not see a method of doing that without my mods
>> or using external password files.
>
>We will do double-crypt and everyone will be happy, right?
Wow optimistic :).
>> if the API as above existed, then i would be happy to see "password" go
away
>> (although it should be depreciated to a --enable option, otherwise you are
>> going to ruin a bunch of existing code).
>
>Who is using it? We can continue to allow it but at some point there is
>no purpose to it unless you have clients that are pre-7.2. Double-crypt
>removes the use for it, no?
I'm using "password".
If I feel that the wire isn't safe I'll use SSL.
Cheerio,
Link.
