At 10:15 AM 8/3/00 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>Isn't it just plain *wrong* to state that null = null? After all, NULL is
>unknown, and is not equal to anything, no?
According to the standard, yes, it is wrong.
>Perhaps it would be more correct for postgresql to provide an option for
>"non-ANSI null handling" as well? And leaving ANSI compliant handling as the
>default?
I would think so.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
