Re: pg_dump & performance degradation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Don Baccus
Subject Re: pg_dump & performance degradation
Date
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.20000731211510.013dd950@mail.pacifier.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump & performance degradation  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_dump & performance degradation
Re: pg_dump & performance degradation
Re: pg_dump & performance degradation
List pgsql-hackers
At 11:41 PM 7/31/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>I am more concerned with giving people a pg_dump option of questionable
>value.  I don't have problems adding it to the C code because it may be
>of use to some people.

I'm uncomfortable because I know of no other *nix utility that has such
options.

If they exist, can someone enumerate them?

It's hard to see why PG is such a special case in this regard, requiring
such an overbearingly groty kludge.




- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chris Bitmead
Date:
Subject: Re: Classes and Inheritance
Next
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump & performance degradation