Re: Performance for seq. scans - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Steve Heaven
Subject Re: Performance for seq. scans
Date
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.20000726123922.0071cca8@mail.thornet.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance for seq. scans  (Jules Bean <jules@jellybean.co.uk>)
List pgsql-general
At 12:28 26/07/00 +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
>> We were in a similar position and went for the 'Full Text Indexing" extra.
>> You'll find it in contrib/fulltextindex.
>> It creates a function which you call on a trigger to produce an index of
>> words for specified fields. These indexes do get _very_ large (one of ours
>> is ~800 MB), but it does work very well and speeds searches up enormously.
>
>If I understand you correctly, that's word-based? It's just splitting
>on whitespace and punctuation?  Unfortunately, that's not quite what
>we need --- our wildcard searches needn't have their '%' on word
>boundaries.
>

There is a function in the source called breakup(). This can be customised
to create the index entries on sub-word strings.

Steve

--
thorNET  - Internet Consultancy, Services & Training
Phone: 01454 854413
Fax:   01454 854412
http://www.thornet.co.uk

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jules Bean
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance for seq. scans
Next
From: Fabrice Scemama
Date:
Subject: Is Pg 7.0.x's Locking Mechanism BROKEN?