Re: Unique Key Violation 7.0 vs. 6.5.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Don Baccus
Subject Re: Unique Key Violation 7.0 vs. 6.5.3
Date
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.20000406173754.01413920@mail.pacifier.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Unique Key Violation 7.0 vs. 6.5.3  (Brian Hirt <bhirt@mobygames.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 07:30 PM 4/6/00 -0500, Brian Hirt wrote:

>  This is not normally 
>a problem because I typically check the constrait before updating.  

If true, this is actually a BIG problem since many applications will
catch any error rather than check first, since this is more efficient...



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brian Hirt
Date:
Subject: Unique Key Violation 7.0 vs. 6.5.3
Next
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: RE: 7.0 like selectivity