At 10:14 PM 6/20/99 -0400, Clark Evans wrote:
>However, RedHat's business is NOT distribution, it is
>standardization.
Thank God and I deleted the rest, thank you.
> And this allows them to spend money
>on open source _if_ it is in their best interest.
Wow, a tautology! I've heard these are really hard
to prove correct.
> I would
>argue that it is in their best interest now, but it
>won't be in a few years after they have a fimly
>established monopoly.
>
>Thus, your exceptions point to a deeper problem with
>open source, rather than positive support for it.
The deeper problem being that open source MIGHT become
as tied to one vendor as closed source, if I read your
argument correctly.
Well, let's imagine for a moment that I concede that
point...
There's still a difference...you still get the source.
I've got candles for sale if you need some to burn at
your Open Source Means Everyone Works For Free Always
shrine.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net
