Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Don Baccus
Subject Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5?
Date
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.19990618211842.00dd03b0@mail.pacifier.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 11:11 PM 6/18/99 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>We are sitting around at this point, just tweeking things, and have no
>major need to rush into a minor release to fix problems because we don't
>have a flood of identical bug reports that have users screaming.

Actually, I noticed this also.  I don't have experience with your
earlier release attempts, but there were enough "wink, wink - we'll
be busy chasing initial release bugs" type comments to make me wonder.

This release is ... somewhat mature.  And you seem to be capturing
areas that regression testing doesn't touch.  I don't have to tell
you that the writing of tests is of crucial importance (though of
course entirely inadequate!). 

I'm really impressed with this release...



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: commits
Next
From: Wayne Piekarski
Date:
Subject: Re:, A, patch, for, FATAL, 1:btree, BTP_CHAIN, flag, was, expected