Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Don Baccus
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Date
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.19990605191929.00dd4e84@mail.pacifier.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@trust.ee>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 11:51 PM 6/5/99 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:

>It is not a genuine bug (as it only slows thong down instead of 
>getting wrong results), but still a misfeature.

Well, it depends on how one defines "bug", I suppose :)  In the
strictest sense you're correct, yet for real world use, particularly
in environments with high traffic, it's a killer.  

>It is most likely an ancient quickfix for some execution path that 
>failed to set the dirty mark when it should have.

Yep, I remember this from the earlier conversation, too.



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6