Hi,
On Sunday, 26 July 2026 at 18:05, Tristan Partin <tristan@partin.io> wrote:
> UUIDv6 is the same as UUIDv1 with some fields reordered. We already
> supported UUIDv1, so let's add support for UUIDv6. Previously, calls to
> uuid_extract_timestamp() would return NULL for UUIDv6 values.
Makes sense, this would be the last missing piece in uuid_extract_timestamp(). The code itself looks good.
> Patch 2 only adds comments. I think the bit manipulation is worthy of
> comments, but others may disagree.
I think it's a good idea. Now it's much easier to understand what's going on with these wild manipulations.
