Re:Re: ERROR: XX000: cannot update SecondarySnapshot during aparallel operation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From fuzk
Subject Re:Re: ERROR: XX000: cannot update SecondarySnapshot during aparallel operation
Date
Msg-id 2fb2c6ad.74b1.1697ac42b3f.Coremail.fuzk80_76@163.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ERROR: XX000: cannot update SecondarySnapshot during a paralleloperation  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: Re: ERROR: XX000: cannot update SecondarySnapshot during aparallel operation  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Re: ERROR: XX000: cannot update SecondarySnapshot during a paralleloperation  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general

Dear Adrian,

My setting is as following.

max_parallel_workers_per_gather=32

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Many thanks
Alan.







At 2019-03-13 22:31:11, "Adrian Klaver" <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote: >On 3/12/19 7:54 PM, fuzk wrote: >> Dear Sir/Madam >> >> I got an error when I execute the following select sentence. >> Would you please solve the problem for me? > >What version of Postgres? > >> Thank you . >> >> Alan Fu. >> >> postgres=# \set VERBOSITY verbose >> postgres=# SELECT >> round(cast(coalesce(sum(ST_length(geography(geometry)))/1000,0) as >> NUMERIC),4)||'KM' field_value from had_link; >> >> ERROR:  XX000: cannot update SecondarySnapshot during a parallel operation >> CONTEXT:  SQL statement "SELECT proj4text FROM public.spatial_ref_sys >> WHERE srid = 4326 LIMIT 1" >> parallel worker >> LOCATION:  GetLatestSnapshot, snapmgr.c:387 > >I'm guessing ST_length is not parallel safe. > >What is your setting for?: > >max_parallel_workers_per_gather > >> >> > > >-- >Adrian Klaver >adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: LDAP authenticated session terminated by signal 11: Segmentationfault, PostgresSQL server terminates other active server processes
Next
From: Rene Romero Benavides
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL temp table blues