Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
Date
Msg-id 2f9f7a18-f3df-e058-c5ed-d73033e11610@postgresfriends.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column  (Gilles Darold <gilles@migops.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/18/21 8:44 AM, Gilles Darold wrote:
> Le 17/10/2021 à 23:48, Isaac Morland a écrit :
>> On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 17:42, Gilles Darold <gilles@migops.com
>> <mailto:gilles@migops.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Note that psql doesn't display a separate line for each row in this
>> case, but the actual result coming back from the server does contain
>> the appropriate number of rows. 
> 
> I was not aware of that. In this case perhaps that we can remove the
> restriction on having at least on expandable column and we will have the
> same behavior but I can't think of an interest to allow that.

Allowing no-column tables removed the need to handle a bunch of corner
cases.  Useful for users or not, the precedent is set.
-- 
Vik Fearing



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: modify error report in mdwrite/mdextend
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)