Re: No hash join across partitioned tables? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Subject Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Date
Msg-id 2f4958ff1003020827o76dfd233mbd0602093eb65c4a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance


On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Partially.  There are stats now but autovacuum is not bright about
>> when to update them.

> Is that something you're planning to fix for 9.0?  If not, we at least
> need to document what we intend for people to do about it.

I want to look at it, but I'm not sure whether the fix will be small
enough that we want to put it in during beta.

I am pretty sure many people will appreciate it, even if it isn't going to be small.
 
Is that stat collection across child tables any useful by it self ?

--
GJ

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST index performance
Next
From: Francisco Reyes
Date:
Subject: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics