Re: Query times change by orders of magnitude as DB ages - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Subject Re: Query times change by orders of magnitude as DB ages
Date
Msg-id 2f4958ff0911250833s22b92dcah9cf3ccac0421b4bc@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Query times change by orders of magnitude as DB ages  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: Query times change by orders of magnitude as DB ages
List pgsql-performance


On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
Richard Neill <rn214@cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> In terms of just index bloat, does a regular vacuum help?

You might want to use the REINDEX command to correct serious index
bloat.  A regular vacuum will make dead space available for re-use,
but won't eliminate bloat directly.  (If run regularly, it will
prevent bloat.)

for that reason, it makes sense to actually partition your data - even tho you don't see performance degradation because of data size, but purely because of nature of data.
Other way, is to perform regular cluster && reindex - but this blocks relations you are clustering..



--
GJ

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Query times change by orders of magnitude as DB ages
Next
From: Steve Crawford
Date:
Subject: Re: RAID card recommendation