Re: Forcing postgresql to use an index - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Subject Re: Forcing postgresql to use an index
Date
Msg-id 2f4958ff0909080833y56e71a69me8aecb3a63f5eb99@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Forcing postgresql to use an index  (Eugene Morozov <eugene@cactus-mouse.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Learn it to not generate with "WITH IN (subq)", is this can be quite
slow on postgresql. Use joins instead.

looks like planner was wrong about rowcount in one place: Hash IN Join
 (cost=2204.80..4809.31 rows=292 width=202) (actual
time=12.856..283.916 rows=15702 loops=1)

I have no idea why, probably more knowledgeable guys will know more
about why. But overall, all other stats seem to be okay.
What's the default_statistics_target setting in the postgresql set to?

One thing tho, what's the version, and platform.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Eugene Morozov
Date:
Subject: Forcing postgresql to use an index
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Forcing postgresql to use an index