Re: \dt+ on 8.4 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Subject Re: \dt+ on 8.4
Date
Msg-id 2f4958ff0905280541y16b13b6ai166d5cf9e2e141dc@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to \dt+ on 8.4  (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
now I know it boils down to pg_relation_size at the end of the day,
cos that's what psql uses. But please tell me guys, that I am not the
only one who would expect true size of table in \dt+ ?
At the end of the day, postgresql 'cheats' behind scenes with toast,
and avid user shouldn't really need to account for that!.

Btw, pgAdmin is able to display that information properly.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jasen Betts
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres registry access using java
Next
From: Suha Onay
Date:
Subject: ERROR: could not find array type for data type numeric[]