Re: SQL With Dates - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Subject Re: SQL With Dates
Date
Msg-id 2f4958ff0904200714x2beda1d2pa0136080e84d15e0@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to SQL With Dates  (Rafael Domiciano <rafael.domiciano@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SQL With Dates
List pgsql-performance
BETWEEN X AND Y

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Rafael Domiciano
<rafael.domiciano@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello People,
>
> I have initiated a work to review the sqls of our internal software.
> Lot of them he problem are about sql logic, or join with table unecessary,
> and so on.
> But software has lot of sql with date, doing thinks like:
> [..]
>   date >= '2009-04-01' AND
>   date <= '2009-04-15'
> [..]
>
> Redoing the SQL with fix date (date = '2009-04-01') o cost in explain always
> still about 200 or less. But with a period the cost is high, about 6000 or
> more.
>
> Select is using Index and the date is using index too.
>
> There is some way to use date period with less cost?
>
> Rafael Domiciano
>



--
GJ

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Matthew Wakeling
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST index performance
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST index performance