Re: lack of consequence with domains and types - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Subject Re: lack of consequence with domains and types
Date
Msg-id 2f4958ff0812261257x482f30a7y80345bed8a4e090b@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: lack of consequence with domains and types  ("Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz" <gryzman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: lack of consequence with domains and types
List pgsql-general
another glance at source code, and docs tells me - that there's not
such thing as default value for custom type - unless that type is
defined as new base scalar type. So probably, that would require
postgresql to allow users to define default values for composite types
as well, like that:
create type foo AS
(
 a int default 1,
 b foodomain default 'foo',
....
);

Going through source code, I have no idea where that would go -
because I got only experience in creating types + custom indices, not
hacking postgresql guts. More help required here, please ..

(I don't know, should that go to -hackers [too]. My recent history
there probably makes majority of folks to ignore my posts straight
away).

Thanks.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: lack of consequence with domains and types
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: lack of consequence with domains and types