Re: lack of consequence with domains and types - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Subject Re: lack of consequence with domains and types
Date
Msg-id 2f4958ff0812221308o695d10bj2ab25fb0e6c4cf12@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: lack of consequence with domains and types  (Erik Jones <ejones@engineyard.com>)
Responses Re: lack of consequence with domains and types
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Erik Jones <ejones@engineyard.com> wrote:
> As mentioned above, by "fixing" the behavior to be what you're expecting
> you'd be breaking the defined behavior of ALTER TABLE.

I don't understand. The domain's have default values, how will it
break alter table ? Please explain.



--
GJ

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: How are locks managed in PG?
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Backup Policy & Disk Space Issues