Re: unnecessary executor overheads around seqscans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: unnecessary executor overheads around seqscans
Date
Msg-id 2eb6ppzfjfk6lawdkpgs2soruihn3lwcliau4oqokc4ykmiilf@244dmhag5hji
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unnecessary executor overheads around seqscans  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I've edited the patch a bit more and pushed it:

- I ended up not liking _impl() that much, and changed it to common. That
  seems more in line what it actually does.

- All the beginscan functions are called beginscan, so I renamed
  table_scan_begin_impl to match

- We normally don't use function names in error message strings. I've
  rephrased the error

- Some comment rephrasing

Greetings,

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: AIX support
Next
From: Alexander Borisov
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-committer reviews: is it helpful?