On 2018/03/06 19:16, Emre Hasegeli wrote:
>> Hmm, state->next refers to two different pointer values on line 1 and line
>> 2. It may end up being set to NULL on line 1. Am I missing something?
>
> True, lnext(state->next) can set it to NULL. I confused by the below
> code on the same function doing the steps in reverse order. With this
> cleared, I have nothing else to say, so I am setting this to ready for
> committer.
Thanks. :)
Regards,
Amit