Re: Review: Hot standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: Review: Hot standby
Date
Msg-id 2e78013d0811250532k53807762o592b99081d931381@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: Hot standby  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Review: Hot standby
List pgsql-hackers
<br /><br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Tom Lane <span dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>></span>wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d"><br
/><br/></div>Huh?  The "read only" transaction mode is not hard read-only anyway,<br /> so if that's the only step
beingtaken, it's entirely useless.<br /><br /></blockquote></div><br />I think there are explicit checks for some
utilitystatements (like VACUUM), but I haven't checked if all necessary code paths are covered or not.<br /><br
/>Thanks,<br/>Pavan<br /><br />-- <br />Pavan Deolasee<br /> EnterpriseDB     <a
href="http://www.enterprisedb.com">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a><br/> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Brittleness in regression test setup