Re: HOT patch - version 15 - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Pavan Deolasee
Subject Re: HOT patch - version 15
Date
Msg-id 2e78013d0709110747m66fdd6c3t50442f1803651364@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HOT patch - version 15  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches


On 9/11/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> writes:
> I would actually think twice before even doing this because this would
> lead to complete change in heap page structure and stop people from
> upgrading to 8.3 without a complete dump/restore. I don't remember 8.3
> introduces any other significant change which already enforces that.

Then you don't remember far enough --- either the HeapTupleHeader change
or the varvarlena change would be enough to prevent that.  For that
matter, the pd_flags header field that the patch is already relying on
is new for 8.3.


Oops! I forgot combo command id. That went into last major release of EDB
and that confused me. Regarding pd_flags, I thought somebody can just
fix that in-place and avoid dump/restore (of course, its too invasive, but
isn't it feasible with pg_migrator ?)

Anyways, given this, should we go for storing xmin in the page header ?
For that matter should there be a separate heap page header ?

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB     http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: HOT patch - version 15
Next
From: "Heikki Linnakangas"
Date:
Subject: Re: HOT patch - version 15