Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonathan S. Katz
Subject Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?
Date
Msg-id 2e6a0e6b-a5d9-e2b5-4956-81c4e156c5db@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/14/23 1:15 PM, Laurenz Albe wrote:

> Let's remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age, and put a note in the release notes
> that recommends using statement_timeout and hot_standby_feedback = on
> on the standby instead.
> That should have pretty much the same effect, and it is measured in
> time and not in the number of transactions.

+1.

Jonathan


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Direct I/O
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Direct I/O