Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date
Msg-id 2e3fb8f2-3ea1-0271-2485-450b9c11da40@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/08/18 8:16, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
>>> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>>> I rebased the patch to HEAD.  PFA a new version of the patch.
>>
>>> Tom, you were instrumental in identifying what was going wrong here
>>> initially.  Any chance you'd be willing to have a look at the patch?
>>
>> I will, but probably not for a week or so.  Going eclipse-chasing.
> 
> Good luck:
> https://xkcd.com/1876/
> And enjoy:
> https://xkcd.com/1877/

Enjoy!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collationentries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values)